|
|
When liberal
paternalism becomes collusion with the Department of Correction
Torture as therapy and therapy as punishment
By Susan
Mortimer
April
2008
The rate of 'suicide' in Massachusetts prisons is three times the
national rate. In the past two years deaths behind bars have escalated
and much attention has been paid to this continuing trend. Ignoring
the root causes of such deaths, the Commonwealth and the press (The
Boston Globe) have pushed instead for ill-conceived reforms, which
will increase the suffering of Massachusetts prisoners, but not the
safety.
Massachusetts Correctional Legal Services, some legislators and the
Disability Law Center presume that these deaths were in fact suicide
and not murder by the DOC; that the prisoners were 'mentally ill' at
the time of their conviction; and that only 'mentally ill' people
commit suicide. While we do not have space here to enumerate all the
reasons why such presumptions are fallacious, we must acknowledge that
racism, poverty and the War on Drugs are the foundation of the prison
industrial complex. Powerlessness, constant stress, solitary
confinement and sensory deprivation inflict great suffering. Lack of
fresh air and exercise, medical neglect and abuse, inadequate
nutrition, guard violence, daily deprivation and degradation combine
to destroy physical and psychological health. From the extremes of
sensory deprivation to seemingly mundane daily occurrences, prison
policy and practice violate human rights. Thus, we believe that
conditions of confinement, inflicted by the state, manufacture
disability.
While we recognize that some behaviors may be viewed as mental
illness, designating and placing the focus of an investigation into
the deaths of 'mentally ill' prisoners allows administrators, guards
and medical staff to evade responsibility for the cruel, inhumane and
degrading conditions that engender such desperate behavior. Further,
labeling people as 'mentally ill' masks disablement caused by child
abuse, poverty, racism, sexism and the coup de grace of prison
conditions. Coping responses to inequality and unsafe conditions must
be differentiated from 'mental illness'. Counterproductive measures
meted out for such coping mechanisms punish individuals for the harms
the DOC inflicts upon them. This institutional abuse brings some
prisoners to a terrible choice: to live in unending despair or to end
their suffering.
The role of paternalism in the development of Residential Treatment
Units is clear. Liberal reformers want to do the charitable thing. But
charity emanates from pity of the allegedly inferior individual; it
does not seek to ally with prisoners to work for systemic change.
Paternalism originates in privilege and assumed superiority. It is
loathe to challenge the power of the state. It wants to do what it
believes is best for the victim without consulting her. Criminal
justice policy born of charitable ideology has had devastating effects
on the minds and bodies of incarcerated people. (Quakers advocated
penitentiaries as a charitable way to improve prisoners’ minds.
Prosecutors and jailors use reforms such as parole to punish and to
lengthen sentences.)
Enter Massachusetts Correctional Legal Services, Representative (and
psychologist) Ruth Balser, the Disability Law Center and the Boston
Globe. The lawyers are suing for Residential Treatment Units (RTU) and
Balser is sponsoring HB1313, a bill calling for $40 million for secure
mental health units within prisons to be staffed with Department of
Mental Health employees. The Globe has editorialized in favor of RTUs.
Last May during oversight hearings on Prison Suicide and Prison Mental
Health at the State House, Boston Globe reporter Beth Healy declined
to accept written testimony from the only invited group opposed to the
treatment units (the Statewide Harm Reduction Coalition). Healy is a
member of the Spotlight Team that spent several months working on a
three-part investigative series on prison suicides. The expose is
biased toward Residential Treatment Units. It appears to have been
directed, particularly regarding the pro-RTU viewpoint, by MCLS’
Leslie Walker. Walker is a long-time proponent of RTUs. The Globe
published her op-ed, touting treatment units, on the final day of its
prison suicide series. She has ignored prisoners and families who
understand that the DOC co-opts reform measures to inflict punishment
and to add to its bloated budget.
By insisting on labeling prisoners who may be suicidal as 'mentally
ill', liberal reformers are choosing not to address the root causes of
prison deaths. Closer monitoring of suicidal prisoners in RTUs would
not treat despair - a product of prison environs. Instead it
formalizes policy, protects the DOC administration and consolidates
more power in the prison industrial complex.
HB1313 gives wide latitude to DOC superintendents and Commissioner
Harold Clarke to administer RTUs under DMH supervision. At present,
however, even low-level guards challenge medical orders, withhold pink
slips (requests for medical attention), look through patient records
and hamper prisoner efforts to get medications in a timely manner.
HB1313 does not address guard interference in provision of therapeutic
services or guard-on-prisoner violence except to mandate forty hours
of mental health training annually for correctional staff assigned to
the treatment units. All other guards would be required to undergo
eight hours of training yearly. Prior studies commissioned by the DOC
have recommended such training. The department has repeatedly failed
to implement even such minimal requirements.
Many prisoners deride the concept of special mental health treatment
units as 'same guards, same treatment, different location'. (See the
writings of Joe Labriola, Albert Gagne, Stephen Metcalf, The Lifers
Group and others at www.massdecarcerate.org.) They understand that the
prison culture affects mental health clinicians as deeply as DOC
employees. Indeed many ‘lifers’ and older prisoners speak eloquently
about being subjected to behavior modification programs, aversive
conditioning, electro-shock ‘therapy’, forced administration of
powerful sedatives and four point restraints.
Nevertheless, against this reformist backdrop the DOC has seized the
liberal momentum. In February, four Custom Therapeutic Modules were
delivered to MCI-Cedar Junction. The CTMs are steel cages, measuring
approximately 4’ by 4’ by 8’, which contain a small opening for
shackled legs and a metal stool. A sales slip shows that the DOC
Central Office in Milford ordered the units at a cost of $15,000 each.
*
Can a person be ‘cured’ in a cage? Can humanization occur in a
dehumanizing atmosphere? If prisoners need treatment, it is, in large
part, for injuries from the institutional violence to which they are
subjected in prison and within a society that wages war against its
young, the poor and people of color.
The push for RTUs inverts cause and effect of disablement in the
prison system. Any legislation, lawsuit or advocacy work which
requires that abused and disabled prisoners be ‘helped’ to heal by the
very entity which tortures them is no help at all. It is betrayal and
collusion with state -sanctioned violence.
*(On April 23, I met with
Representative Ruth Balser’s aides. I provided a copy of the sales
slip and photographs of “Custom Therapeutic Modules. The
Representative was invited to comment. On April 28 Balser’s aide Jake
Larson was again invited to provide a comment. To date there has been
no response.)
-----
Susan Mortimer is an anti-prison
activist whose disabled brother is a Massachusetts prisoner. She knew
Anthony Garafolo, a paraplegic, whose June 2006 death in a prison
hospital unit the Department of Correction has labeled a suicide.
Andrea Hornbein
contributed to this article.
SEE PRISONER WRITINGS:
$40 Million Rip-off by Al Gagne,
The Murder of Minds, Prison Suicides
by Joe Labriola and
Ineffectiveness of Mental Health and Sex
Offender Treatment under DOC, Parole Board and Public Safety
Supervision by Stephen Metcalf at
www.massdecarcerate.org.
Photographs and sales slip for DOC’s delivery of
Custom
Therapeutic Modules
to MCI-Walpole are also at
www.massdecarcerate.org.
HB1313 text
Suggested reading:
Disablement, Segregation and Prisons by Marta
Russell, The Monthly Review July/August 2001.
Visit
www.StopForce.org.
Lorraine Jaillet’s April 28 comments regarding RTUs: - Hi Susan, I am
responding to your article for “The Bridge' re: Residential Treatment
Units. As you know my son Anthony Garafolo died at the M.C.I. Shirley
Health Services Unit on June 20, 2006, a death that never should have
happened. All my son wanted was to have the 'slot' opened on his cell
door to get some 'air.' He was refused that simple request. He made a
lot of noise, used vulgarity in hopes that someone would listen. Hours
later they found him hanging by a sheet in the shower; an act that he
could not have accomplished because he was a paraplegic and because he
could not get his wheelchair into the shower stall. I STRONGLY believe
that my son died at the hands of the guards. He was begging for air
and the 'staff' would not even open the slot on his door. Now these
'cages' (Custom Therapeutic Modules), 4’x4’x8’ are supposed to be the
solution. I think not! When will they ever learn that the culture has
to change within those walls? These are the same guards and medical
staff that will be in charge of prisoners in these cages. Advocates
and legislators speak of trying to help the ‘mentally ill’. Most of
the prisoners are not mentally ill, and if they are, the 'culture
within' is driving them there. My son was NOT mentally ill. His
intestines were protruding from the surgical site on his buttocks. DOC
and medical staff let this happen. Staff did nothing to help him. They
allowed his colostomy bags to overflow. I witnessed this myself during
visits. The 'staff' would say is 'they’re on order'. This is what I am
trying to convey to anyone who cares to listen. CHANGE THE CULTURE
WITHIN the walls. These are prisoners; they are also human beings.
Treat them accordingly. I personally am not going to go away. My son
was murdered at the hands of the D.O.C and I hope to prove this.
Lorraine Jaillet (Anthony Garafolo's Mother)
|
|